Why Nationalism Is Returning Worldwide?

For much of the late twentieth century, many scholars believed that nationalism would gradually decline. The collapse of the Soviet Union, the expansion of globalization, the growth of international institutions, and the rise of digital connectivity appeared to signal the arrival of a more cosmopolitan world. Influential thinkers spoke of a “global village,” a “borderless world,” and even the “end of history.” The expectation was that economic integration, liberal democracy, and transnational networks would steadily weaken national identities.

However, the first quarter of the twenty-first century has produced a very different reality. Across continents, nationalism has returned as one of the most powerful political forces of our time. From the United States and India to China, Russia, Turkey, Hungary, Italy, France, and many parts of Africa and Latin America, political movements increasingly invoke national identity, sovereignty, culture, religion, and historical memory. Electoral victories of nationalist parties, growing skepticism toward globalization, renewed border controls, anti-immigration sentiment, religious nationalism, and geopolitical competition all indicate that the nation-state remains the central framework through which people understand politics and belonging. Far-right parties now receive more than 23 percent of votes across Europe, a dramatic increase compared with the 1990s.

The return of nationalism is not a temporary incidence. It reflects deep structural transformations in economics, culture, technology, demography, and geopolitics. Rather than disappearing, nationalism has adapted to the conditions of the digital age. Here in this discussion, we argue that the contemporary resurgence of nationalism is driven by seven interlinked forces: the backlash against globalization, economic insecurity, migration and demographic change, cultural anxiety, the crisis of liberal democracy, the digital transformation of politics, geopolitical competition, and the human search for identity and meaning. Understanding these forces is essential because nationalism is likely to remain one of the defining political phenomena of the twenty-first century.

Understanding Nationalism

Nationalism is usually misunderstood as merely patriotism or love of one's country. In essence, nationalism is a political doctrine that holds that the nation should be the primary source of political legitimacy and collective identity. While patriotism emphasizes affection for one's country, nationalism goes further by asserting that a particular national community possesses distinct interests, values, and historical experiences that should be protected and promoted.

Historically, nationalism emerged in Europe during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries alongside the French Revolution, industrialization, and the decline of dynastic empires. It helped unify Germany and Italy, inspired anti-colonial movements across Asia and Africa, and shaped the modern international system. Nationalism has therefore always possessed a dual character. It can serve as a force for liberation and self-determination, but it can also become exclusionary, authoritarian, and aggressive. The crucial question today is not whether nationalism is returning. The question is, why is it returning.

Globalization Backlash

Perhaps the most important explanation for contemporary nationalism lies in the contradictions of globalization. During the 1990s and early 2000s, globalization promised prosperity through free trade, open markets, and global integration. While globalization generated immense wealth, its benefits were distributed unevenly. Large metropolitan centers prospered and financial sectors expanded. Equally, highly skilled workers benefited from global opportunities. However, many industrial regions experienced deindustrialization, wage stagnation, and economic uncertainty with millions of people believing that globalization served transnational corporations, financial elites, and urban professionals while neglecting ordinary citizens.

In both developed and developing countries, many citizens increasingly perceived that decisions affecting their lives were being made by distant institutions, multinational corporations, or global markets rather than democratic national governments. Nationalist leaders productively transformed these grievances into political narratives, with arguments that sovereignty had been surrendered to global elites and that national control needed to be restored. Ultimately, the result is a growing demand for stronger borders, domestic industries, economic protection, and national self-determination. Concomitantly globalization did not eliminate nationalism rather it strengthened the desire for it.

Economic Insecurity and the Politics of Fear

Economic anxiety plays a critical role in nationalist resurgence. It is not simply about poverty or concerns about uncertainty, rather individuals who fear downward mobility often become receptive to narratives promising stability, protection, and collective solidarity. Research consistently demonstrates that support for nationalist and populist movements tends to increase in regions affected by industrial decline, unemployment, and economic restructuring. Nationalist rhetoric provides a simple explanation for complex problems by identifying external threats such as foreign competitors, immigrants, multinational corporations, or international institutions. The 2008 global financial crisis is one of the example where the crisis undermined confidence in neoliberal economic models and weakened faith in political establishments. Many citizensacross the concluded that governments were willing to rescue financial institutions while ordinary people bore the costs. Such perceptions intensified distrust of elites and strengthened movements promising to prioritize national interests. Nevertheless, economic insecurity alone does not create nationalism, but it creates fertile conditions for nationalist mobilization.

Migration, Demographic Change, and Cultural Anxiety

The modern era is characterized by unprecedented levels of human mobility. Large-scale migrations have transformed societies across Europe, North America, the Middle East, and parts of Asia. While migration often contributes positively to economic development, it can also generate concerns regarding cultural continuity, social cohesion, and national identity. Many people ask:

• Who belongs?
• What defines national identity?
• Can cultural traditions survive rapid demographic change?

Recent international surveys show that many people continue to define national belonging through language, customs, religion, and historical traditions. In many countries, religion remains strongly connected to perceptions of national identity. Leaders present themselves as defenders of cultural heritage, historical memory, and traditional values against perceived external threats. Importantly, cultural anxiety often persists even when economic conditions improve, because people may fear cultural displacement more than material deprivation. This helps explain why nationalism has risen even in relatively prosperous societies.

Crisis of Liberal Democracy

Another major driver of nationalism is the growing crisis of democratic legitimacy. Across many parts of the world, citizens express declining trust in political parties, legislatures, media organizations, and governmental institutions. Freedom House reports (2026) that global freedom has declined for nearly two decades, while democratic institutions face mounting pressures across multiple regions. Equally political rights and civil liberties have deteriorated in many countries with citizens perceiving traditional political elites as detached, unresponsive, and incapable of addressing pressing social concerns. Nationalist leaders exploit this distrust by presenting themselves as authentic representatives of “the people” against corrupt establishments. Their message is often straightforward:

• The nation has been betrayed.
• Elites have ignored ordinary citizens.
• National renewal requires reclaiming sovereignty.

These narratives resonate strongly during periods of institutional crisis.

Digital Media and the New Nationalism

One of the most fascinating aspects of contemporary nationalism is that it has flourished within the very technological spaces once expected to weaken it. Early internet enthusiasts believed digital communication would foster global citizenship and increase the cosmopolitan outreach. However, contrary is evidenced with social media frequently amplifies national identities and reward emotionally charged content. Nationalist narratives often emphasize pride, grievance, victimhood, historical memory, and collective destiny - all highly engaging themes. Therefore, digital platforms have become a powerful arena for national storytelling allowing nationalist movements to:

• Mobilize supporters rapidly.
• Disseminate symbols and narratives.
• Construct virtual communities.
• Reinforce group identities.

Religious Nationalism: The Fusion of Faith and Nation

A particularly important contemporary development is the rise of religious nationalism, which links national identity with religious identity. It portrays a nation as possessing a special religious heritage that must be protected. Recent international surveys indicate substantial variation in how closely religion and national identity are connected, but in many societies religion remains a powerful marker of belonging. Examples include:

• Hindu nationalism in India.
• Christian nationalism in parts of the United States.
• Orthodox nationalism in Russia.
• Buddhist nationalism in Myanmar and Sri Lanka.
• Islamic nationalism in various Muslim-majority countries.

Religious nationalism provides emotional depth that purely civic nationalism often lacks, and connects political identity to sacred history, moral values, and collective destiny, and thereby making religious nationalism a particularly resilient form of nationalism.

Geopolitical Competition and National Revival

The return of great-power competitions has further strengthened nationalism. The post-Cold War era was characterized by relative American dominance, but today, the international system is increasingly multipolar. The rise of China, the resurgence of Russia, regional power competition, and growing strategic rivalries have revived nationalist discourse worldwide. States increasingly frame international relations in civilizational and national terms, for example China emphasizes national rejuvenation, Russia invokes historical destiny and civilizational uniqueness, India highlights cultural nationalism and strategic autonomy. Equally western countries increasingly discuss sovereignty, national resilience, and strategic independence. Geopolitical competition therefore, reinforce national consciousness by encouraging populations to view international politics through the lens of collective national interests.

Nationalism as a Response to Identity Crisis

Beyond economics and politics lies a deeper sociological explanation for the resurgence of nationalism - one rooted in the human need for identity, belonging, and meaning. Throughout history, people have derived their sense of self from relatively stable social institutions such as family, religion, local communities, and long-standing cultural traditions. These institutions provided not only social support but also a clear understanding of who individuals were, where they belonged, and what values guided their lives.

Modernity, however, has profoundly transformed these traditional foundations of identity. Processes such as industrialization, urbanization, globalization, and technological change have reshaped social life in unprecedented ways. In many societies, religious institutions no longer occupy the central place they once did, reducing their role as the primary source of moral authority and collective identity. Communities have become increasingly fragmented as urban living, migration, and individualistic lifestyles weaken long-standing social ties and neighbourhood networks. Families have also become smaller and more geographically dispersed, limiting the intimate support systems that traditionally anchored people's identities. At the same time, expanding education, economic opportunities, and social mobility have enabled millions of people to move beyond the communities into which they were born. While this mobility has created new possibilities for personal advancement, it has also loosened the cultural and social bonds that once provided stability. Adding to these transformations, digital technologies and social media have fundamentally altered human relationships. Individuals today are more connected than ever before, yet many experience increasing loneliness, social isolation, and a diminished sense of genuine community. Online interactions often replace face-to-face relationships, while algorithm-driven digital spaces expose people to constant political, cultural, and ideological conflicts, intensifying uncertainty rather than reducing it.

Cumulative effect of these changes is what many sociologists describe as a crisis of belonging. Individuals frequently experience feelings of dislocation, insecurity, and uncertainty about their place in an increasingly complex and rapidly changing world. The sociologist Émile Durkheim referred to a similar condition as anomie - a state in which rapid social transformation weakens shared norms and leaves individuals without a clear sense of direction. More recently, scholars such as Zygmunt Bauman have described contemporary society as "liquid modernity," where social relationships, careers, identities, and institutions have become increasingly fluid and unstable. It is within this context that nationalism acquires renewed significance. National identity offers something that many other social institutions no longer consistently provide: a stable and emotionally meaningful sense of belonging. It connects individuals to a shared history, a collective memory, common symbols, cultural traditions, and a broader national community that extends across generations. National narratives provide continuity between the past, present, and future, enabling individuals to see themselves as participants in a larger historical journey.

Unlike many political ideologies that appeal primarily to rational interests, nationalism also speaks to powerful emotions. It cultivates solidarity, pride, sacrifice, loyalty, and collective purpose. National flags, anthems, historical commemorations, and public rituals reinforce emotional attachment to the nation and strengthen feelings of shared destiny. Even among individuals who differ in class, ethnicity, or political preferences, national identity can provide a common framework through which they interpret social change and collective challenges. This helps explain why nationalism often becomes particularly influential during periods of rapid economic, technological, or cultural transformation. When familiar institutions appear fragile and traditional identities lose their certainty, the nation emerges as one of the few enduring sources of stability. It offers not merely policy solutions but an answer to fundamental human questions: Who are we? Where do we belong? What binds us together.

The contemporary resurgence of nationalism, therefore, cannot be understood solely through economic grievances or political competition. It also reflects a profound sociological response to the uncertainties of modern life. In an age characterized by globalization, digitalization, and constant social change, national identity continues to provide millions of people with meaning, continuity, and a sense of belonging that many other institutions struggle to offer.

Different Faces of Contemporary Nationalism

It is important to recognize that contemporary nationalism is not a single phenomenon. Scholars increasingly distinguish between several forms of nationalism, including civic nationalism, ethnic nationalism, religious nationalism, and populist nationalism. Recent research on neo-nationalism highlights the diversity of contemporary nationalist movements. Some nationalist movements emphasize democratic self-government and civic participation. Others stress ethnicity, religion, or cultural exclusivity. Some seek national renewal within democratic frameworks. Others challenge liberal democratic norms. This diversity means that nationalism cannot simply be classified as either good or bad. Its consequences depend upon the values, institutions, and political contexts in which it operates.

Future of Nationalism

As aforementioned, the evidence suggests that nationalism is unlikely to disappear in the foreseeable future. Several long-term trends point toward its continued relevance:

• Persistent geopolitical rivalry.
• Ongoing migration pressures.
• Technological disruption.
• Economic inequality.
• Cultural polarization.
• Democratic dissatisfaction.
• Identity-based politics.

At the same time, nationalism will continue evolving. Future nationalism may increasingly focus on:

• Digital sovereignty.
• Technological competition.
• Energy security.
• Climate adaptation.
• Scientific and industrial self-reliance.

Indeed, some analysts now speak of "scientific nationalism" and "technological nationalism" as emerging dimensions of global competition. The nationalism of the future may be less concerned with territory alone and more concerned with data, technology, innovation, and strategic autonomy.

Conclusion

The return of nationalism is one of the defining political developments of the twenty-first century. Far from disappearing under globalization, nationalism has adapted and re-emerged with remarkable strength. Economic insecurity, migration, cultural anxiety, democratic disillusionment, digital communication, geopolitical rivalry, and the human search for belonging have combined to create fertile conditions for its resurgence. Nationalism endures because it addresses questions that globalization has never fully answered: Who are we? Where do we belong? What binds us together?

The future of nationalism remains uncertain. It can inspire democratic participation, collective solidarity, and national development. Yet it can also foster exclusion, intolerance, and conflict. The central challenge for contemporary societies is therefore not whether nationalism will exist, but what kind of nationalism will prevail. Will it be inclusive or exclusionary? Civic or ethnic? Democratic or authoritarian? The answer to these questions may shape the political future of the twenty-first century more profoundly than any other ideological struggle.

References

1. Bieber, F. (2018). Is Nationalism on the Rise? Assessing Global Trends. Nationalities Papers, 46(4), 519–540.
2. Freedom House. (2025). Freedom in the World 2025: The Uphill Battle to Safeguard Rights.
3. Freedom House. (2026). Freedom in the World 2026.
4. Ipsos. (2026). What Worries the World Survey.
5. Pew Research Center. (2024). National Identity Index.
6. Pew Research Center. (2025). Comparing Levels of Religious Nationalism Around the World.
7. Pew Research Center. (2025). What Makes Someone Truly Belong in a Country?
8. PRRI. (2025). Christian Nationalism Across All 50 States.
9. Rooduijn, M. et al. (2026). PopuList Project Findings on Far-Right Electoral Support in Europe.
10. Zhou, S. (2022). The Origins, Characteristics and Trends of Neo-Nationalism in the 21st Century. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1).
11. Wagner, C., & Cai, X. (2026). Network Evolution and National Interests: Global Scientific Reorganization and the Rise of Scientific Nationalism.